June 8, 2015
Clark Gascoigne, +1 202 293 0740 ext. 222
![G7 Leaders meet in Schloss Elmau, Germany on June 7, 2015 | Image: European External Action Service/Flickr [CC BY-NC 2.0]](https://34n8bd.p3cdn1.secureserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/G7-Leaders-2015-Flickr-CC-BY-NC-2-by-European-External-Action-Service717x359.jpg)
G7 leaders meet in Germany on June 7, 2015 | Image: European External Action Service/Flickr [CC BY-NC 2.0]
G7 Communiqué Ignores Illicit Flows in the Context of the Post-2015 Development Agenda
World Leaders Urged to Target Illicit Flows, Trade Misinvoicing at FfD Conference
WASHINGTON, DC – Global Financial Integrity (GFI) expressed disappointment in world leaders Monday for failing to advance efforts to curtail illicit financial flows—particularly in the context of the Post-2015 Development Agenda. The G7 failure comes despite a new GFI study released on Wednesday showing the outsized-impact that illicit financial flows (IFFs) have on the poorest countries in the world, and notwithstanding a Friday pledge by UK Prime Minister David Cameron to put corruption on the agenda of the G7 Summit, which concluded today in Germany.
“We are very disappointed in the G7’s inaction on the issue of illicit financial flows,” said GFI Managing Director Tom Cardamone, an expert on international financial crime. “While crime, corruption, and tax evasion pose a serious threat to advanced economies—such as those represented in the G7—they have an outsized impact on the poorest countries in the world. With the UN’s Financing for Development (FfD) Conference just over a month away, failing to take a strong position on illicit flows—the most damaging economic problem plaguing the developing world—is a huge opportunity missed.”
While the G7 Communiqué does mention illicit financial flows briefly—reiterating essential previous commitments to the automatic exchange of financial information and the importance of beneficial ownership transparency—the leaders make no mention of illicit financial flows in the context of the Post-2015 Development Agenda, which is set to be hashed out in next month’s Financing for Development (FfD) Conference’s Outcome Document and in the Sustainable Development Goals this September.
Need to Address Trade Misinvoicing
Likewise, the topic of trade misinvoicing—the method for channeling nearly 80 percent of all measurable illicit outflows from developing countries—is not mentioned anywhere in the document, despite lengthy discussions around trade.
“Concerted action is needed by the international community to assist all developing nations in curtailing the phenomenon of ‘trade misinvoicing’ (i.e. trade fraud) which moves up to 80 percent of all illicit funds offshore,” said Mr. Cardamone, who is leading the organization’s work on the FfD process. “As world leaders continue to negotiate the outcome of next month’s Financing for Development Conference, curtailing trade misinvoicing must be a focus given its link to domestic resource mobilization.”
“We look forward to a robust agreement that: 1) mandates the IMF to regularly measure trade misinvoicing levels from all developing countries; 2) commits the world community to halve trade misinvoicing in all developing countries by 2030; and 3) requires donor countries to provide financing for trade pricing databases and training in customs departments, so poor nations can stop misinvoiced goods before they leave the ports. It’s simply impossible to produce a credible FfD Outcome Document that doesn’t commit to measuring and reducing trade misinvoicing by an explicit percentage,” added Mr. Cardamone.
Outsized Impact on Poorest Countries
While GFI’s longstanding research estimates that illicit outflows drain roughly US$1 trillion from developing and emerging economies each year, the new GFI analysis reviewed illicit outflows from 82 of the poorest countries in the world and compared them to various development indices. The study found, for example, that one-quarter of them have an IFFs/GDP ratio of above 10 percent, 32 have IFFs that are greater than 10 percent of total trade, and 20 have IFFs that are greater than their combined total of inward ODA+FDI (Official Development Aid + Foreign Direct Investment). More specifically, Liberia’s illicit outflows were equivalent to 61.6 percent of its GDP, Equatorial Guinea’s annual illicit outflows averaged roughly US$4,000 per person, and Nepal’s IFFs were 186 times larger than its inward foreign direct investment.
###
Notes to Editors:
- Click here for an HTML version of this press release.
- To download the 2015 G7 Leaders Communiqué, click here (PDF). To download the Annex to the communiqué, click here (PDF).
- For more information about the GFI report, “Illicit Financial Flows and Development Indices: 2008–2012,” published Wednesday, June 3, 2015, click here.
- To read a new blog post from GFI Managing Director Tom Cardamone on the impact of illicit flows on the poorest developing countries, click here.
Journalist Contact:
Clark Gascoigne
cgascoigne@gfintegrity.org
+1 202-293-0740 ext. 222 (Office)
+1 202-815-4029 (Mobile)